|
[ Home ] [
Documents ] [ White Papers ]
White Paper on Public
Service Training and Education
July 1997
Contents
List of Abbreviations
Executive Summary PART 1: Context and Vision
CHAPTER 1: Background and Policy Context
CHAPTER 2: Problem Statement
CHAPTER 3: Vision, Mission and Goals
CHAPTER 4: Policy Alternatives
PART 2: Implementation Framework
CHAPTER 5: Training Principles, Priorities and Guidelines for
PSTE CHAPTER 6: Institutional Arrangements
CHAPTER 7: Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisims
CHAPTER 8: Institutional Support Programmes
CHAPTER 9: Finance
APPENDIX A: Notes on Problem Statements
APPENDIX B: Training Principles from chapter C of the Public Service
Staff Code APPENDIX C: Illustration of Possible Public Service Competencies
APPENDIX D: National Standards Bodies and Learning Fields
APPENDIX E: Education and Training Quality Assurers (ETQA)
APPENDIX F: Functions of Sectoral Education and Training
Organisations APPENDIX G: Illustration of core Competences, Performance Criteria
and Outcomes - Administrative Assistants and Equivalent Grades
[ Top ]
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
| ATEP |
Association of Accredited Education and Training Providers |
| ABET |
Adult Basic Education and Training |
| AG |
Auditor General |
| CDS |
Capacity Development Standard |
| DG |
Director General |
| DPSA |
Department of Public Service and Administration |
| ETQA |
Education and Training Quality Assurer |
| EU |
European Union |
| GEAR |
Growth, Employment and Redistribution: Macro-economic
Strategy |
| GPPSTE |
Green Paper on Public Service Training and Education |
| HDI |
Historically Disadvantaged Institution |
| HR |
Human Resources |
| HRD |
Human Resources Development |
| JUPMET |
Joint Universities Public Management Educational Trust |
| MPSA |
Ministry for the Public Service and Administration |
| NEDLAC |
National Economic and Development Labour Council |
| NGO |
Non-governmental Organisation |
| NQF |
National Qualifications Framework |
| NSB |
National Standards Body |
| PAS |
Personnel Administration Standard |
| PERSAL |
Personnel Salary System |
| PSC |
Public Service Commission |
| PSETO |
Public Service Education and Training Organisation |
| PSTE |
Public Service Training and Education |
| PSTI |
Public Service Training Institute |
| PVET |
Professional and Vocational Education and Training |
| RDP |
Reconstruction and Development Programme |
| SAMDI |
SA Management Development Institute |
| SANDF |
SA National Defence Force |
| SAPS |
SA Police Service |
| SAQA |
SA Qualifications Authority |
| SETO |
Sectoral Education and Training Organisation |
| SGB |
Standards Generating Body |
| SME |
Small and Medium Enterprises |
| TCS |
Training Course Standard |
| WPPSTE |
White Paper on Public Service Training and Education |
| WPTPS |
White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service |
[ Top ]
Executive Summary
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The principal aim of this White Paper on Public Service
Training and Education (WPPSTE) is to establish a clear vision and policy framework to
guide the introduction and implementation of new policies, procedures and legislation
aimed at transforming public service training and education into a dynamic, needs-based
and pro-active instrument, capable of playing an integral and strategic part in the
processes of building a new public service for a new and democratic society in South
Africa.
1.2 The anticipated outcome will be a new system of public
service training and education that will be:
- strategically linked to broader processes of transformation,
institution building and human resources development within the public service;
- strategically linked to the NQF and SAQA frameworks, as well
as to the Department of Labour's proposals for a new Skills Development Strategy;
- strategically planned and effectively resourced;
- based on the elevation of the importance and status of
training and trainers;
- effectively organised, coordinated and accredited in ways
which promote quality, accountability and cost-effectiveness;
- flexible and decentralised within national norms and
standards;
- based on broad participation and involvement by all relevant
stakeholders;
- capable of promoting uniform outcomes through a multiplicity
of accredited providers;
- capable of promoting access by all personnel to
meaningful training and education opportunities;
- capable of promoting the empowerment of previously
disadvantaged groups;
- capable of facilitating the development of effective career
paths for all public servants;
- demand-led, needs-based and competency-based;
- capable of promoting positive learning outcomes which add
value to individual and organisational capacity.
1.3 In working towards these outcomes, the WPPSTE
recommends a number of important innovations and changes in the direction, management and
operation of the current system of training and education which are consistent, amongst
other things, with the policy environment set by the new Constitution, the Reconstruction
and Development Programme (RDP), the Macro-Economic Strategy for Growth, Employment and
Redistribution (GEAR), the White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service
(WPTPS), and the Department of Labour's Green Paper on a Skills Development Strategy for
Economic and Employment Growth in South Africa.
1.4 Whilst this document concentrates on the provision of
formal training and education opportunities, it nevertheless recognises the key role that
can be played by less formal though no less important forms of staff development,
especially through on-the-job learning opportunities such as coaching, mentoring, work
shadowing, job rotation, job enrichment, and participation in multi-skilled project teams.
[ Top ]
1.5 The White Paper is based on the consultative Green
Paper on Public Service Training and Education which was published in March 1997 by the
Minister for Public Service and Administration (Government Gazette No. 17852, Vol. 381).
Both documents have benefited from an extensive process of consultation, discussion and
debate both within and outside the public service. This was seen as essential both to the
development of sound policy documents and to the forging of a new and more inclusive
identity for the public service.
1.6 This executive summary outlines briefly the core policy
problems addressed by the WPPSTE, a new vision and mission proposed for PSTE, and a number
of key policy options. It also provides a summary of the key recommendations of the WPPSTE
with regard to:
- key training principles and priorities;
- operational guidelines for putting them into effect;
- the development of a coordinated institutional framework for
PSTE;
- the introduction of effective mechanisms for monitoring and
evaluation;
- the establishment of a number of institutional support
programmes for PSTE;
- the placing of PSTE on a sound financial footing.
2. POLICY PROBLEMS
The core problem that this White Paper seeks to address,
comprises three related elements:
- The fragmented and uncoordinated approach to training and
education across the public service resulting in the absence of resources and
accountability for ensuring that public servants are empowered and developed to take on
the challenges they face.
- The lack of a strategic, needs-based, outcomes-based and
competency-based approach to PSTE, directly related to the developmental needs of the
public service as outlined in the RDP, the WPTPS and other related policy documents.
- The inappropriate nature of the training and education that
is provided by many in-service and external providers.
3. VISION AND MISSION
The new public sector education and training policy will be
guided by the following vision:
| The development of a dedicated, productive and
people-centred public service staffed by public servants whose performance is maximised
and whose potential is fully developed via the comprehensive provision of appropriate and
adequate training and education at all levels. |
In striving for the above vision, the policy will seek to
achieve the following mission:
| The creation of a coordinated framework for ensuring
the provision of appropriate and adequate public service training and education that will
meet the current and future needs of public servants and contribute positively to the
realisation of the vision. |
The values and principles that underlie the above vision
and mission include - [ Top ]
- equality of access by all personnel at all levels to
meaningful training opportunities;
- empowerment of previously disadvantaged and marginalised
groups;
- democratic, non-racist and non-sexist policies, practices
and values;
- Lifelong learning, particularly through the NQF;
- effective career paths for all public servants;
- broad participation and involvement by all relevant
stakeholders;
- mutual understanding and respect, and tolerance for
diversity;
- quality and cost-effectiveness in human resource
utilisation;
- efficiency, effectiveness and a professional service ethos;
- flexibility and decentralisation within national norms and
standards.
4. POLICY OPTIONS
Four policy option were considered:
- Centralised state provision of education and training.
- Decentralised state provision of education and training.
- Decentralised non-state provision of education and training.
- Centralised setting of norms and standards, together with
decentralised provision by state and non-state providers in a competitive framework.
The last option was selected because it combines maximum
creativity and flexibility at the delivery end, but without undermining the need to build
a unified public service with a common culture and value system.
[ Top ]
5. PRINCIPLES, PRIORITIES AND GUIDELINES FOR PSTE
5.1 A systematic and comprehensive review of existing
procedures and regulations pertaining to public service training and education will be
carried out, and appropriate changes made, with a view to overcoming constraints and
facilitating the successful implementation of the principles, policies and intervention
recommended in the WPPSTE.
5.2 Particular attention will be focused on current systems
of access and entitlement to training, prescribed courses, accreditation, and the
operation of the personnel administration standard (PAS), as well as the relation of
training and education to policies and procedures on job grading, remuneration, promotion,
performance appraisal and recruitment and selection.
5.3 Changes in existing procedures and regulations will be
accompanied, where necessary, by enabling legislation, in line with the proposed changes
envisaged in the Green Paper on Policy Proposals for a New Public Service Statute.
5.4 Based on this review of public service training and
education, new and revised national norms and standards will be developed by the
Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA), in accordance with the principles,
priorities and guidelines outlined in Chapter 5 of this document, in consultation with all
relevant stakeholders at national and provincial levels, and in negotiation, where
appropriate, with the employee organisations represented in the Public Service
Coordinating Bargaining Council.
5.5 More specifically, a review of prescribed courses will
be undertaken with a view to promoting greater flexibility and relevance by replacing the
prescription of courses with the prescription of core competences for different grade
levels. The responsibility for realising such competences through the design and delivery
of appropriate courses will be left to individual departments and provinces, in
collaboration with training providers.
5.6 In order to ensure the uniformity and quality of
training outcomes, steps will be taken to establish more effective structures, procedures
and criteria for accreditation and quality assurance. The DPSA and the proposed Public
Service Education and Training Organisation (PSETO) will take the lead role in this
respect, in consultation with key stakeholders.
5.7 Effective forms of liaison will be established with the
Department of Education and labour to ensure that these structures, procedures and
criteria can be effectively integrated into the NQF and SAQA framework, as well as into
the framework of Sectoral Training and Education Organisations (SETOs) and learnerships
proposed in the Department of Labour's Green Paper on a Skills Development Strategy.
5.8 The new system of accreditation will apply to all
training providers, whether in-house or external. Courses will no longer be accredited
individually. Instead training providers will be assessed for accreditation under one or
more broad fields of competence, linked to the NQF. They will then only be allowed to
tender for public service training and education in the specific fields or areas in which
they have received accreditation.
5.9 Departmental and provincial training plans will be
based on a detailed assessment, analysis and prioritisation of individual and
organisational needs. The analysis of organisational needs will relate in particular to
such issues as the improvement in service delivery and service ethos, the creation of
rationalised and cost-effective structures, institution building and management,
representivity and affirmative action, and the promotion of greater internal and external
accountability.
5.10 The assessment of individual needs (personal,
performance-related and career-related), will be facilitated by the introduction within
departments and provincial administrations of a system of personal development plans for
all employees. These will be designed to identify the needs of staff, and appropriate
forms of staff development, training and education through which they can be met.
5.11 Personal development planning will need to be
positively related to the introduction and operation of new and improved forms of
performance appraisal, promotion and career progression opportunities more generally.
[ Top ]
5.12 National departments and provincial administrations
will be required to produce strategic plans for training and education. These will include
priorities, objectives and targets; action plans for their implementation; the
identification of the necessary financial and other resources to support such plans; and
the mechanisms that will be used for internal monitoring and evaluation. Strategic plans
for training and education will be linked to broader institutional plans for service
delivery, human resource development and organisational development, as well as to the
budget planning process.
5.13 Departments and provincial administrations who develop
effective forms of needs assessment and strategic planning will be eligible for the award
of the Capacity Development Standard (CDS), signifying excellence in the field of training
and education. Awards will be presented annually by the Minister for the Public Service
and Administration.
5.14 Tendering systems will be reviewed and improved in
ways which support the new approach to training and education outlined in this document.
6. COORDINATED INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
6.1 An efficient, cost-effective, consultative and well
coordinated institutional framework for public service training and education will be
established, centred around the following key processes:
- Strategic policy formulation and coordination
- Operational decision-making, planning and implementation
- Standard setting and the registration of qualifications
- Accreditation and quality assurance
- Organisation and coordination of training provision and
providers
- Monitoring and evaluation
6.2 The DPS will facilitate the establishment of the
following organisations and ensure that they become operational as soon as possible:
- A Public Service Education and Training Organisation
(PSETO), to take the lead role in standard setting, accreditation and quality
assurance.
- An Association of Accredited Training and Education
Providers (ATEP), to ensure the effective planning and coordination of the work of
internal and external training providers.
6.3 Constructive forms of liaison and cooperation will be
fostered between the DPSA and the Departments of Labour and Education, to ensure that the
institutional arrangements for public service training and education are effectively
integrated into the NQF framework and the Department of Labour's new Skills Development
Strategy.
6.4 Clear roles and responsibilities will be allocated to
the principal bodies and role-players at national and provincial levels who will play a
key part in driving these processes, in particular the DPSA, the PSC, Heads of Departments
and Provincial Administrations, Employee Organisations, Departmental and Provincial
Training Committees, and the PSETO once it is established.
[ Top ]
Key Institutional Processes and Role-Players
| KEY INSTITUTIONAL PROCESS |
KEY ROLE-PLAYERS |
KEY PARTNERS |
Strategic Policy Formulation and
Coordination
|
DPSA; PSETO
|
PSC; Portfolio Committee; Heads of Department; Unions |
Operational decision-making, planning and implementation
|
Heads of department (national and provincial DGs and heads of other organisational components) |
HR Directors; Training Committees; Workplace Forums
|
Standard setting and qualifications
|
National Standards Bodies; Standards Generating Bodies; PSETO |
DPSA; Provider Interest Groups
|
Accreditation and quality assurance
|
PSETO; other SETOs
|
Registered assessors; DPSA; SAQA |
Delivery, organisation and coordination of training provision
|
SAMDI, provincial training bodies; external providers; Association of Accredited Providers (ATEP) |
PSETO; DPSA
|
Monitoring and evaluation
|
DPSA; PSC; Heads of Department
|
PSETO; Portfolio Committee; Training Committees; Public Sector Transfor- mation Forum; Transformation Units |
6.5 Measures will be taken to strengthen the capacities of
these bodies, to ensure the effective coordination of their work, and to clarify and, if
necessary, restructure their respective roles and relationships.
[ Top ]
6.6 The role and functions of SAMDI will be reviewed, with
a view to:
- placing SAMDI on a more competitive and cost-recovery
footing;
- ensuring that SAMDI supports strategic government policy
initiatives, e.g. capacity building for provinces and departments with respect to
decentralisation and delegations of administrative powers.
6.7 With regard to education and training provision, the
Government will encourage the development of a multiplicity of education and training
providers operating as equals in a market environment. These will include internal (e.g.
SAMDI and provincial training bodies) and external providers such as universities,
technikons, NGOs and private training organisations.
6.8 Making use of a more varied and competitive range of
training and education providers has the potential benefit of improved flexibility,
quality and cost-effectiveness. The attendant risk of uneven standards will be alleviated
by the introduction of improved forms of accreditation and quality assurance, within the
proposed SAQA framework and managed by the PSETO once fully operational. The establishment
of an Association of Accredited Training and Education Providers should also help in this
respect.
6.11 In order to improve communication and information
about training provision, a computerised national database will be established, containing
details of accredited providers and their courses.
7. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
7.1 Improved mechanisms for the monitoring and evaluation
of training and education will be introduced, both at the national level and at
departmental and provincial levels, where departmental and provincial training committees
will have a particularly important role to play. Specific criteria and performance
indicators will be drawn up to form the basis for effective monitoring and evaluation.
7.2 At the national level, a monitoring unit will be
established within the Training Policy component of the DPSA to monitor and evaluate the
overall effectiveness of the implementation of the new training and education policy. This
unit will liaise closely with the PSC which will also have an important role to play in
monitoring and evaluation. Public service unions and the PSETO, once established, will
also have important roles to play in this respect.
[ Top ]
7. THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT PROGRAMMES
8.1 A number of institutional support programmes will be
established to assist in giving practice to the new policy framework for training and
education as set out in this document. Donor funding will be sought to support such
initiatives. The institutional support programmes will include:
- A Fast Track Training and Education Programme - to
support Departments at National and Provincial levels in designing and implementing
appropriate fast track training and education programmes to build institutional capacity.
- A Regulatory Framework Programme - to identity the
legal and regulatory activities that will be required to effectively implement the White
Paper on PSTE.
- An Institutional Development Programme - to support
the establishment of such bodies as the PSETO and the proposed Association of Training and
Education Providers.
- A Strategic Planning and Management Support Programme
- to assist national departments and provincial administrations in the establishment of
effective strategic planning mechanisms and processes in the field of training and
education.
- A Donor Support and Coordination Programme - to
ensure continuing donor funding for internal and external training providers, whilst
ensuring the long-term development of local capacity.
- An Information and Communication Programme - to
assist in the setting up of a sophisticated and computerised information system and
database for public service training and education.
9. FINANCIAL PROVISIONS
9.1 The DPSA will liaise with the Departments of Finance
and State Expenditure, and with donors, to ensure an adequate, sustainable and equitably
distributed funding source for public service training and education.
9.2 At the departmental and provincial levels, a formula
will be developed and introduced which will make it compulsory for budgets to contain a
line item on training and education. In particular the formula will require Heads of
Departments to ensure that an appropriate budgetary allocation is made for training and
education in proportion to the number of type of staff employed.
9.3 The formula will be based on agreed norms and standards
in relation to -
- the time to be made available for training and education
(for example, an average of 5 days per person per year);
- a specified financial target for training and education (for
example, one per cent of each spending agency's previous years total budget).
9.4 A more sophisticated formula will be developed as more
reliable data become available. This will be based, amongst other things, on the number
and type of staff in each department and the training needs that have been identified and
prioritised.
9.5 Funds for PSTE could be allocated from a National
Training Fund, as suggested in the Department of Labour's Green Paper on a Skills
Development Strategy, although further consideration will clearly have to be given to the
financial implications of this suggestion for Government as an employer.
9.6 The proposed new national institutional arrangements
for PSTE (such as the PSETO) will be financed out of the budget of the DPSA in the
short-term. If it is decided to convert a section of the training policy component of the
DPSA to lay the groundwork for the PSETO, additional donor funds will also be sought to
enhance capacity for this unit for the funding of additional short-term personnel and
programmes.
9.7 The DPSA will also liaise with the Department of
Education, with a view to securing changes in the current subsidy formula that will
provide tertiary institutions involved in the training and education of public servants,
and prospective public servants, with greater incentives than at present to develop and
expand their activities in the fields of public and development management. This would
serve to promote the greater involvement of tertiary institutions (and specifically HDIs)
in public service training and education, in line with the recommendations in this
document and the White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service.
9.8 A review will be carried out of the current schemes for
financial assistance to employees (and prospective employees) for purposes of training and
education. One of the main aims of this review will be to identify ways of ensuring
greater equity in the access to training and education opportunities, particularly for
lower level employees, many of whom until recently, were disadvantaged by regulations
which did not provide for financial assistance to employees seeking training and education
at the pre-tertiary education level.
[ Top ]
PART 1: CONTEXT AND VISION
CHAPTER 1
BACKGROUND AND POLICY CONTEXT
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 The government has committed itself to transforming
the public service through its White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service
(WPTPS, 1995). This transformation is inspired by the vision of a people-centred and
people-driven public administration characterised by the principles of equity, quality,
high ethical standards and professionalism. A critical element in transforming the public
service is through training and education for public servants.
1.1.2 The introduction and extension of adequate and
appropriate training and education programme for public servants is seen as an essential
condition for the successful implementation of the WPTPS. It is internationally accepted
that the performance of public servants can be substantially improved via training and
education programmes.
1.1.3 Currently, training and education for public servants
is governed by provisions in the 1994 Public Service Act (as amended), Chapter L of the
Public Service Staff Regulations and Chapter C of the Public Service Staff Code. These
provisions need to be comprehensively reviewed if the demands of transformation are to be
met. The main aim of this White Paper on Public Service Training and Education (WPPSTE) is
to provide a new national strategic policy framework on training and education for public
servants which contributes positively to the goals of public service transformation. It
also aims to bring public service training and education in line with international best
practices, current global trends in human resource development, and the national strategic
policy context.
1.1.4 This White Paper is based on the consultative Green
Paper on Public Service Training and Education which was published in March 1997 by the
Minister for Public Service and Administration (Government Gazette No. 17852, Vol. 381).
Both documents have benefited from an extensive process of consultation, discussion and
debate both within and outside the public service. This was seen as essential both to the
development of sound policy documents and to the forging of a new and more inclusive
identity for the public service.
1.1.5 This White paper is divided into two main parts. Part
1 provides an overview of the policy context and the current challenges and constraints
facing public service training and education (PSTE). It also provides a new vision and
mission for PSTE. Part 2 sets out a framework through which the main policy proposals in
the document can be effectively implemented. The main body of the document is accompanied
by an Executive Summary which sets out the purpose of the White Paper, together with the
key recommendations.
[ Top ]
1.2 NATIONAL STRATEGIC POLICY CONTEXT
Before the advent of the new democratic dispensation in
April 1994, public service training and education was limited to meeting a narrowly
defined band of needs, with a particular emphasis on management which was predominantly
white and male in composition. The new policy proposed in this White Paper advocates a
radical departure from that approach and is guided by a combination of policies, which
include:
- the new Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
- the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP), 1994
- the Macro-Economic Strategy for Growth, Employment and
Redistribution (GEAR), 1996
- the White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service,
1995
- the Department of Labour's Green Paper on a Skills
Development Strategy for Economic and Employment Growth in South Africa, 1997
- the Green Paper on Employment and Occupational Equity, 1996
- the Green Paper on A New Law for a New Public Service:
Policy Proposals for a New Public Service Statute, 1996
- The Green Paper on A National Disability Strategy, 1996
1.2.2 The new policy context that emanates from these
policies points to the need for a major investment in skills development and capacity
building to improve the performance, productivity, quality and cost-effectiveness of the
public service. In particular it points to the need to bring public service training and
education policies in line with the international trend towards competency-based training
and education, the emerging South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA), a consideration
for accessibility and equity in the provision of training and education, and new
approaches towards Adult Basic Education and Training (ABET).
1.3 SCOPE
1.3.1 The policy proposals outlined in this White Paper
focus on those public servants employed under the Public Service Act (1994). However, in
line with policy proposals in the recent Green Paper on a new Public Service Statute, the
principles and overall approach in this document will be deemed to be relevant and
applicable to other sectors of the public sector where training and education fall under
sectoral regulatory frameworks, i.e. police, defence, education, health, parastatals and
local government.
1.3.2 According to the 1995 Annual Report of the Public
Service Commission, there were 1 270 112 people employed in the public service as at 30
September 1995. This comprised 412 405 public servants employed by national government
departments and bodies, and 857 707 employed by provincial governments. Major sectors such
as health, education, police and defence have their own sector-based training and
education policies, regulatory frameworks and delivery institutions.
1.3.3 The transversal training and education of the
approximately 20 per cent of personnel not covered by sector-based arrangements forms the
core focus of the White Paper on Public Service Training and Education (WPPSTE). However,
the WPPSTE seeks to put in place a national framework that will have implications for the
structure, management and delivery modes of training and education for all public
servants, including those covered by sector-based arrangements.
1.3.4 Whilst this document concentrates on the training and
education needs and requirements of serving officials, it also recognises the importance
of improving the current systems of pre-service training and education. This will
be vital in ensuring that the service is able to attract and recruit high quality
personnel, particularly from those sectors of society that have been historically
disadvantaged, and specifically Black people (African, Indian and Coloured), women and
people with disabilities.
1.3.5 Whilst this document also concentrates on the
provision of formal training and education opportunities, it nevertheless recognises the
key role that can be played by less formal though no less important forms of staff
development, especially through on-the-job learning opportunities such as coaching,
mentoring, work shadowing, job rotation, job enrichment, and participation in
multi-skilled project teams.
[ Top ]
1.4 FOCUS
1.4.1 The White Paper addresses in the first place,
the qualitative and quantitative dimensions of the training and education programmes that
are designed and delivered by institutions located within and outside the public service.
These programmes should build the knowledge, skills and attitudes required by both serving
and prospective public servants if they are to become efficient and effective members of
the type of public service envisaged in the WPTPS. This combination of knowledge, skills
and attitudes is what is referred to in more general terms as the "capacity"
that public servants are expected to develop both prior and subsequent to joining the
service. The WPPSTE is concerned with the training and education services that both
prospective and serving public servants can access.
1.4.2 In the second place, the WPPSTE addresses the
training and education needs of three broadly defined categories of personnel, namely
- senior management and senior professional staff;
- middle management, skilled supervisory and professional
staff;
- front-line staff.
1.5 TRAINING VERSUS EDUCATION
1.5.1 Whilst recognising that there are many different
types and levels of training and education (from a professional degree to structured forms
of on-the-job training), this White Paper nevertheless rejects the rigid distinction
between education and training that has been inherited from the past, which equated
education with knowledge acquisition and training with operational skills development.
This division was in the past associated with the split between tertiary education and
skills training by training institutions. It is now national policy that tertiary
institutions must also take responsibility for skills training within a competency
framework. In line with international trends as expressed most clearly in the Green Paper
on a Skills Development Strategy, training and education should be seen as equally
weighted components of the entire learning process.
1.5.2 In line with these trends and developments, the
WPPSTE will therefore be based on the assumption that training and education are equally
weighted components of a holistic capacity building process that should become the
foundation for all programmes that cater for the training and education needs of the
public service, no matter who is responsible for delivering them.
[ Top ]
1.6 CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR PSTE
1.6.1 Challenges
6.1 Challenges
1.6.1.1 In developing a coherent, relevant and needs-based
system of PSTE, capable of playing an integral and strategic part in the process of
building a new public service for a new and democratic society in South Africa, a number
of important challenges and constraints will need to be faced and overcome. Chapter 2
provides greater detail on such constraints.
1.6.1.2 At the general level, key challenges that will need
to be addressed by the policy framework for PSTE proposed in the document include:
- The need to achieve a sufficient increase in productivity to
realise the twin and potentially conflicting goals of fiscal restraint and improved
service delivery.
- The need to develop a system of PSTE that is accessible to
all
levels of personnel (senior management, middle management and professional staff, and
front-line workers), and capable of meeting their specific and distinctive needs.
- The need to replace the current fragmented system of PSTE
with a more coherent and coordinated one, without resorting to a highly centralised and
prescriptive framework that could easily stifle initiative and replace one set of
inefficiencies with another.
1.6.2 Opportunities
1.6.2.1 It is equally important to recognise that there are
positive opportunities, as well as challenges, that can be exploited in transforming the
current system of PSTE. What is needed is a pro-active and visionary approach which
recognises and addresses problems, but which also exploits opportunities and builds upon
current strengths.
1.6.2.2 Amongst the strengths and achievements that can be
built upon are the improvements in PSTE that have taken place in recent years. Examples
include the restructuring and reorganisation of the South African Management Development
Institute (SAMDI), and the introduction of an improved set of principles and procedures
for guiding PSTE in the form of the amended Chapter L (on "Training") of the
Public Service Regulations.
1.6.2.3 Significant opportunities for PSTE are also
presented through the emerging National Qualifications Framework (NQF), and through the
new skills development strategy outlined in the Department of Labour's recent Green Paper.
1.6.2.4 The Department of Labour's Skills Development
Strategy provides the most significant framework for guiding the development of a policy
framework for public sector training and education. In particular, the strategy allows for
a multiplicity of providers who are required to operate within a uniform qualifications
framework. This allows for the standardisation of outputs without undermining flexibility
when it comes to choice of training and education providers. Furthermore, it allows for
the establishment of Sectoral Education and Training Organisations (SETOs) that will
develop qualification specifications that are directly relevant to the sector, but
consistent with the NQF in general.
[ Top ]
1.7 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS
The main stakeholders who are deemed to have a stake in
this White Paper and who will play a role in its formulation, adoption and eventual
monitoring and evaluation during implementation are as follows:
- Cabinet
- Provincial Legislatures and Executive Councils
- Inter-Governmental Forum
- Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on the Public Service and
Administration
- The Ministry and Department for the Public Service and
Administration
- The Ministries and Departments of Education, Labour and
Finance (including State Expenditure)
- Public Service Commission
- The political and administrative heads of departments at
national and provincial levels
- Presidential Review Commission
- The Coordinating Bargaining Council and Sectoral Bargaining
Councils
- Workplace Forums
- The South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) and
associated bodies and councils
- Statutory Agencies such as the Finance and Fiscal
Commission, the Gender Commission, and the Human Rights Commission
- Office on the Status of Women in the Office of the Deputy
President
- Office on the Status of Disabled Persons in the Office of
the Deputy President
- South African Federal Council on Disability (SAFCD)
- Departmental Training Committees
- Transformation Units and Forums
- The South African Management Development Institute (SAMDI)
- Provincial training bodies
- External training providers in the NGO and private sectors
- Tertiary education institutions
- Professional Councils and Bodies in the training and
education field
- Relevant civil society stakeholders and business
organisations (including industry training boards)
[ Top ]
CHAPTER 2
PROBLEM STATEMENT
2.1 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROBLEM
2.1.1 In developing this policy document, primary and
secondary research was undertaken to identify the dimensions of the current problems and
the implications for the process of transforming PSTE. Although the primary research focus
was on transversal training and education in those parts of the public service covered by
the Public Service Act 1994, evidence was also collected on public sector training
more generally (including sector-specific training and education in national departments
such as Education, Health and Safety and Security, as well training in local government).
2.1.2 Despite recent improvements that have been introduced
in the system of PSTE, the research revealed a wide range of current problems related to
the quantity and quality of training and education provided to public servants, and public
sector employees more generally.
2.1.3 This chapter summarises the magnitude of the current
problems by drawing on relevant literature and legislation, discussions and interviews
with various stakeholders and intensive investigations by officials from the DPSA. Further
details, especially of a quantitative and statistical nature, are provided in Appendix A.
2.1.4 While care has been taken in assessing the problem
and highlighting the main problem areas, considerable difficulty was encountered in
securing accurate statistics that adequately illustrates the nature, scope and depth of
the problem. This in itself reflects the extent of the problems related to public service
training and education, especially with regard to the monitoring and evaluation of
training programmes and outcomes.
2.1.5 The main focus in this chapter is on problems
relating to transversal training, although the issues raised will undoubtedly have
relevance for sector-specific training and education. Although research evidence suggests
that significant progress has been made with respect to sector-specific training,
particularly in the area of professional development (especially in the education, health,
police and defence and local government sectors), the general trend is that such sectors
have not yet fully adopted new competency-based approaches to adult learning.
[ Top ]
2.2 KEY PROBLEM AREAS
The main problems and concerns raised during the process of
research and discussions with stakeholders will be considered under the following broad
headings:
- The low priority accorded to training and education, and the
low level and uneven nature of provision.
- The lack of funding and effective management of training
budgets.
- The lack of coordination and communication.
- The number and quality of trainers.
- Discriminatory barriers to access and entitlement.
- Inflexible and discriminatory rules and regulations.
- The overly prescriptive, supply-driven and outdated nature
of training and education.
- Lack of effective systems of accreditation and quality
assurance.
- Lack of effective systems for strategic planning and review.
2.2.1 Low Priority and Uneven Nature of Provision
Historically, PSTE has been accorded relatively low
priority, particularly in the area of transversal training and especially at the lower
levels. This has manifested itself in a number of related ways:
- The low level of investment in PSTE, compared to countries
at a similar level of development (See Note 1 of Appendix A), resulting in generally low
levels of participation in structured training and education activities.
- The uneven nature of provision - capacity building has
tended to focus on management and operational staff to the exclusion of front-line
workers, for whom minimal training opportunities are provided (See Note 2 of Appendix A).
Unevenness in training provision also exists between different provinces and national
departments.
- The relatively low status enjoyed by training components and
trainers (See Note 3 of Appendix A).
- The lack of top management support to managerial and
supervisory staff to encourage and enable them to take a more effective and pro-active
role in the management of staff training and development (See Note 4 of Appendix A).
2.2.2 Financial Problems
2.2.2.1 National and provincial departments, and local
authorities have failed in general to make adequate financial and human resource provision
for training components within their organisational structures (See Note 5 of Appendix A).
External donor funds, where these have been available, have often been fragmented and
poorly managed. As a result, many training units are seriously understaffed and
under-resourced, and have very limited administrative, organisational and financial
capacity to handle and service the training and education needs of their departments.
2.2.2.2 Annual expenditure on training as a percentage of
the annual salary bill reveals the very small amounts devoted to training and education by
most national departments and provincial administrations. In the majority of cases, the
actual expenditure on training and education represents less than 1% of annual salary
expenditure (See Figure 1 in Note 6 of Appendix A). Training expenditure per employee, as
well as the frequently insignificant sums spent on training and education by different
national departments and provincial administrations, also demonstrate tremendous
unevenness (See Figure 2 in Note 7 of Appendix A).
2.2.2.3 Despite the low level of funds committed to PSTE,
many departments and provincial administrations still fail to effectively utilise their
entire training budget (See Figure 3 in Note 8 of Appendix A). While a range of factors
(lack of suitable courses, the pressures of rationalisation, transition, etc.) might help
to account for this, many stakeholders are of the view that unspent funds are a reflection
of the reluctance by senior management to provide decisive and visionary leadership with
respect to training and education.
[ Top ]
2.2.3 Lack of Coordination and Communication
2.2.3.1 The existing institutional regime for training and
education lacks a commonly binding strategic focus and well coordinated institutional
arrangements. This results in confusion, duplication, and overlapping of functions,
responsibilities and powers (See Figure 4 and Tables 1 & 2 in Note 9 of Appendix A).
2.2.3.2 Poor communication, conflicting information and a
lack of coordination of training and education between and among different levels of
training structures and providers, complicate training delivery (See Note 10 of Appendix
A).
2.2.3.3 The absence of a central and provincial database
for human resource development and training related matters inhibits information sharing
and dynamic interchange. Many stakeholders consulted in the preparation of this documented
expressed concern that information about training opportunities is often poorly
communicated to staff.
2.2.3.4 Establishing a harmonious and integrated
relationship between human resource development, strategic planning, organisational
realignment and budgeting is extremely difficult under the existing institutional training
regime.
2.2.4 The Number and Quality of Trainers
2.2.4.1 The low and inadequate ratio of training officers
to staff complements (1:3 818 for the service as a whole, rather than the PSC's approved
ratio of 1:2 000), places training staff and infrastructure under considerable pressure
with attendant consequences on quality and impact (See Table 4 & 5 in Note 11 of
Appendix A).
2.2.4.2 The relatively low number of professional training
staff is compounded by the absence of continuous and effective programmes of training and
development for public service trainers. Present policy does not allow for the
professional development of trainers and training units, thereby limiting the potential
contribution of training and education to the broad transformation goals of
reconstruction, development and social empowerment. This has made it difficult for
trainers to meaningfully contribute to changing the ethos and culture of the public
service (See Figure 5 in Note 12 of Appendix A). As a result, the training of trainers was
identified in all provinces as a key priority area (See Note 13 of Appendix A).
2.2.4.3 The current racial and gender profile of public
service trainers (predominantly white and male) also has a potential to compromise the
ability of training providers and institutions to play a pro-active role in changing the
ethos and culture of the bureaucracy (See Note 14 of Appendix A).
2.2.5 Concerns on Internal and External Training and
Education Providers
2.2.5.1 Most universities and technikons provide degree and
certificate programmes to potential and serving public servants. Given that there is often
no needs analysis to determine the needs of government, it has been established that in
many cases these programmes are outdated and not relevant to the competency needs of the
Public Service. There is no mechanism to allow for interaction between external providers
and the government on needs and accreditation.
2.2.5.2 Perceptions about the role, image and status of
internal providers in the administration, design and delivery of courses/programmes varied
along the favourable-unfavourable continuum. The reason for this is part historical and
partly shaped by the perception that the internal providers previous role of
monopoly training provider and course developer placed them in an inordinately powerful
position to dictate the content, scope, depth and packaging of courses which impacted (and
continues to impact) very profoundly on the ethos, culture and policy adaptability of the
public service (See Note 15 of Appendix A).
2.2.5.3 Concern was also expressed on the lack of clarity
with respect to the role, responsibilities and functions between internal training
providers at national and provincial level and external training providers. Such confusion
is exacerbated by the nature of South Africa's transition and the consequent absence of
firm policy guidelines in this regard. This seriously hampers the provision and delivery
of training, resulting in no training taking place at all in some instances, and
unnecessary duplication in others. Where training does take place, it tends to be executed
on an ad hoc or crisis intervention basis without clear strategic goals.
[ Top ]
2.2.6 Barriers to Access and Entitlement
2.2.6.1 The lack of effective training opportunities for
all or most staff, and especially for front-line workers, is compounded by a number of
existing discriminatory barriers. Until earlier this year (1997), for example, bursaries
for formal studies were not available for courses at the pre-tertiary level thereby
restricting the access of many employees at the lower levels to effective training and
education opportunities (See Note 16 of Appendix A). This anomaly has now been rectified,
however.
2.2.6.2 Similarly, current regulations pertaining to the
recruitment and appointment of people with disabilities, serve to confine many disabled
workers to the status of temporary rather than permanent employees, effectively precluding
such employees from participating in the full range of training and education
opportunities (See Note 17 of Appendix A). The temporary status of disabled employees and
the limited range of training and education opportunities available, restrict disabled
employees to particular occupational classes, with very little prospect for upward
mobility. Such prospects are further constrained by the fact that special provision is not
made for them in the various courses and programmes that they are able to access (See Note
18 of Appendix A).
2.2.7 Inflexible and Discriminatory Rules and
Regulations
2.2.7.1 In many instances (including those cited in Section
2.2.6 above), regulations and procedures governing training in particular and personnel
issues more generally, reinforce historical patterns of discrimination, domination,
manipulation and control. By so doing, they help to augment a regimented and mechanistic
bureaucracy that stifle innovation, creativity and individual initiative, thus
constituting a significant obstacle in the way of implementing new policy proposals (See
Note 19 of Appendix A).
2.2.7.2 Key examples of inflexible and discriminatory rules
and regulations include the current systems of:
- performance appraisal: The current system is overly
formalistic, with insufficient attention to the developmental and capacity building needs
of staff (See Note 20 of Appendix A);
- recruitment and selection: Current procedures
overemphasise the importance of formal qualifications and experience, and under-emphasise
the value of competences acquired through less formal means. This is to the detriment of
previously disadvantaged groups, and have implications on the development of effective
affirmative action programmes (See Note 21 of Appendix A);
- promotion: Current procedures rely more on seniority
and the possession of formal qualifications, rather than on competency. This serves to
impede the promotion prospects of formerly disadvantaged groups, again with serious
implications for the effective implementation of affirmative action policies and
programmes (See Note 22 of Appendix A);
- Personnel Administration Standard (PAS): Current
regulations regarding the operation of the PAS system serve to impede mobility between
occupational classes and the development of flexible forms of career pathing envisaged in
this White Paper and the Department of Labour's Green Paper on a Skills Development
Strategy (See Note 23 of Appendix A).
[
Top ]
2.2.8 Prescriptive, Supply-driven and Outdated PSTE
2.2.8.1 Concern was expressed by many stakeholders that
many current training courses and programmes continue to be prescriptive and
supply-driven. What is really needed is a flexible, needs-based, outcomes-based and
competency-based approach to PSTE.
2.2.8.2 Consultation with stakeholders revealed a number of
problems with the current system of prescribed training courses. These generally
refer to the fact that training policy is overly prescriptive and lacks flexibility in
relation to the changing work environment, organisational development and strategic
planning. Problems identified, include:
- a lack of flexibility within departments, provincial
administrations and training providers in tailoring prescribed training and education
programmes to suit local conditions and satisfy individual and institutional needs;
- a lack of correlation between training courses and the
actual competences required to perform effectively at a particular level;
- a lack of recognition of relevant competences acquired
through prior learning (See Note 24 of Appendix A);
- a lack of cost-effective use of alternative and less
expensive forms of staff development;
- a lack of motivation among staff who feel that they are
compelled to attend such courses (See Note 25 of Appendix A); and
- demands on the limited time of DPSA staff in considering the
many requests from departments and provincial administrations for deviations from the
prescribed norms.
2.2.8.3 Concern was expressed that the content of many
training courses lacks relevance to the needs of the new public service (See Note 26 of
Appendix A), and that teaching and learning methodologies are often outdated and not in
line with new experiential and interactive approaches to adult learning (See Note 27 of
Appendix A).
2.2.9 Problems with Accreditation and Quality Assurance
2.2.9.1 The current system of accreditation of training
providers and their products is too ad hoc to permit the development of effective
uniform standards across the public service as a whole. The absence of commonly accepted
norms for evaluating training courses and programmes impact negatively on the timely and
effective delivery of training.
2.2.9.2 Lack of clarity regarding accreditation has
frustrated provincial governments' planning with respect to staffing, human resource
development and organisational capacity building, tailored to service delivery needs and
broader RDP goals. Provincial government officials are unclear about who is responsible
for setting the norms and standards for training.
2.2.9.3 The ad hoc nature of the current
accreditation system has contributed to the rapid increase of training courses and
programmes, offered by private external providers. The quality and effectiveness of many
of such courses and programmes are generally not controlled through accreditation
requirements and there are no follow-up or impact studies. Concern has therefore been
expressed about the quality, standards and relevance of such programmes (See Note 28 of
Appendix A).
[ Top ]
2.2.10 Lack of Effective Systems for Strategic Planning
and Review
2.2.10.1 Many of the above problems point to a central
weakness in the current system of PSTE - the absence of effective systems of strategic
planning and review, both at the departmental, provincial and local government levels, as
well as in terms of the strategic direction and coordination of the PSTE system as a
whole.
2.2.10.2 Until recently, few departments and local
governments employed a strategic approach to the planning of their training and education
provision, based on a systematic analysis of individual and organisational needs. Few
attempted to link plans for training and education to broader plans of institutional
development and service delivery, or to the budget planning cycle. Although a number of
national departments, provincial administrations and local governments (especially the
larger ones) are now moving in this direction, a considerable scope for improvement still
exists.
2.2.10.3 An indispensable part of the move towards more
effective forms of ongoing planning and review of PSTE will be a significant improvement
in current systems of monitoring and evaluation, many of which are ad hoc and
rudimentary. The introduction of improved mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation will
need to be accompanied by improved forms of data collection and retrieval.
2.3 CORE POLICY PROBLEMS
2.3.1 Unleashing the transformation potential of training
and education in accord with the principles contained in the Constitution, the
developmental objectives of current government policy and the strategic priorities of the
different provinces and departments will necessitate a decisive and radical overhaul of
the training and education regime inherited from the past.
2.3.2 The core problem that this White Paper seeks to
address comprises three related elements:
- The fragmented and uncoordinated approach to training and
education across the public service, resulting in the absence of resources and
accountability for ensuring that public servants are empowered and developed to take on
the challenges they face.
- The lack of a strategic, needs-based, outcomes-based and
competency-based approach to PSTE, directly related to the developmental needs of the
public service as outlined in the RDP, the WPTPS and other related policy documents.
- The inappropriate nature of the training and education that
is provided by many in-service and external providers.
[ Top ]
CHAPTER 3
VISION, MISSION AND GOALS
3.1 VISION
3.1.1 Public service training and development will be
founded on the following vision:
| To contribute towards the development of a
dedicated, productive and people-centred public service staffed by public servants whose
performance is maximised and whose potential is fully developed through the comprehensive
provision of appropriate, adequate and accessible training and education at all levels. |
3.1.2 This vision is based on the belief that any
organisation is only as strong as the people who work for it, and in particular on the
conviction that training should and must play an integral and strategic part in the
processes of building a new public service for a new and democratic society in South
Africa.
3.1.3 Whilst acknowledging the danger of seeing training
and education as the solution to all organisational problems, the Government nevertheless
recognises the significant contribution that training and education can make, as part of a
broader strategy for human resources development, to the efficiency, effectiveness,
accountability, responsiveness and representivity of the public service. In particular,
training and education, if properly conceived and structured, can:
- help to equip all public servants, whether workers or
managers, with the necessary knowledge, skills and competences to carry out their jobs
effectively in pursuit of the new vision and mission for the public service, as outlined
in the White Paper on the Transformation of the Public Service;
- enable public servants to deal effectively and pro-actively
with change and the challenges of a dynamic work and external environment;
- form an integral part of the process of increasing the
representivity of the public service in terms of race, gender and disability, by
facilitating respect for and accommodation of diversity in the workplace;
- enable public servants to acquire a new development oriented
professionalism and the appropriate skills and knowledge with which to implement the RDP;
- assist public servants in reorienting many of the values and
practices which they acquired under the previous dispensation;
- help to address issues of diversity, while also promoting a
common organisational culture to support unity at the workplace and the ethos of a single
public service;
- be a powerful instrument for anticipating, as well as
facilitating the introduction of institutional changes within the public service;
- assist public servants in developing a better understanding
of the needs of the communities which they are serving, as well as a capacity to respond
to these needs.
3.1.4 The above vision is based on the underlying values
and principles expressed in the Constitution, the RDP, the WPTPS, the Department of
Labour's Skill Development Strategy, and other policy statements. In summary, the relevant
principles include the promotion of -
- equality of access by all personnel at all levels to
meaningful training and education opportunities;
- empowerment of previously disadvantaged and marginalised
groups;
- democratic, non-racist and non-sexist policies, practices
and values;
- Lifelong learning, particularly through the NQF framework;
- effective career paths for all public servants;
- broad participation and involvement by all relevant
stakeholders, including the public;
- mutual understanding and respect, and tolerance for
diversity;
- quality and cost-effectiveness in human resource
utilisation;
- efficiency, effectiveness and responsiveness;
- professional service ethos;
- accountability and transparency;
- flexibility and decentralisation within national norms and
standards.
[ Top ]
3.2 MISSION
3.2.1 In pursuit of the above vision, the Government sees
its mission as:
| The creation of a coordinated framework for ensuring
the provision of appropriate, adequate and accessible public service training and
education that will meet the current and future needs of public servants, the public
service and the public, and contribute positively to the realisation of the vision. |
3.2.2 Through the creation of such a national policy
framework for training and education, the Government will seek in particular -
- to enable all public servants to develop their knowledge,
skills and attitudes in ways which serve to maximise performance in their current roles;
- to allow them to regularly review their training and
education needs and requirements, and to provide ways of meeting these;
- to provide opportunities for them to prepare themselves for
changing roles, duties and responsibilities within the public service;
- to increase job satisfaction and facilitate career
progression;
- to motivate and enable all public servants to contribute
positively to the transformation and operation of the new public service in South Africa.
3.3 GOALS
3.3.1 In putting the above vision and mission into
practice, the central goals will be:
- To establish clear and effective national norms and
standards with particular reference to training and education principles, priorities
and guidelines.
- To establish appropriate institutional arrangements
for the formulation, implementation and evaluation of policy, and to ensure in particular
that such arrangements are strategically linked to the broader processes of human
resources development, institution building and transformation in public sector
organisations.
- To ensure that the implementation of the policy framework
and recommendations set out in this document is effectively monitored and evaluated,
in accordance with realistic and relevant performance measures, targets and time-frames.
- To ensure that departments at national and provincial level
are supported to develop appropriate institutional support programmes to address
the current and future needs of the public service, its diverse clients and the people who
work for it.
- To secure adequate financial provision for the
implementation of the new public sector training and education policy, and to ensure that
training budgets are not the first thing to be sacrificed in times of financial
stringency.
These five goals form the subject matter of Chapters 5 to 9
respectively in Part 2 of this document.
[ Top ]
3.4 POLICY INDICATORS
3.4.1 The realisation of the above vision and mission will
be evaluated in terms of the following indicators on an annual basis.
3.4.2 Vision
Output: Whether the capacity of public servants has
improved in accordance with an agreed measurement.
Impact: Whether improvements in the capacity of public
servants have improved the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the public service from
a citizen point of view.
Means: Annual reports of the Public Service Commission and
the Public Service Education and Training Organisation (PSETO) that will be delivered to
Parliament in the case of the former and to the Minister for Public Service and
Administration in the case of the latter.
3.4.3 Mission
Output: Whether an efficiently and effectively coordinated
framework for ensuring the provision of appropriate and adequate public service training
and education has been established and sustained.
Impact: Whether the training and education needs of public
servants have been met.
Means: Annual reports of the Department of Public Service
and Administration, Public Service Commission and PSETO.
[ Top ]
CHAPTER 4
POLICY ALTERNATIVES
4.1 SCENARIOS
4.1.1 Four broad scenarios have been drawn from the
international context and have been used here to identify an appropriate institutional
framework for public service training and education:
Option 1: Centralised Model
A centralised and prescriptive training and education
system, pertaining in countries such as France, whereby all public servants are required
to go through a single state-controlled institution.
Option 2: Decentralised State-Provision Model
The introduction of a fully decentralised system of
internal state provision under which national departments and provincial administrations
would have the resources and freedom to design and deliver their own internal training
programmes independently from each other.
Option 3: Decentralised Non-State Model
The introduction of a fully decentralised non-state system,
pertaining in countries such as the United States, under which national departments and
provincial administrations would be free to select external providers that meet their
needs without interference from higher levels of authority.
Option 4: Coordinated Flexible Competency-Based Model
This is an approach based on the Department of Labour's
proposed Skills Development Strategy, which combines -
- strong central strategic direction, accountability,
coordination and the adherence to national norms and standards; with
- the increasing decentralisation to departments and
provincial administrations of day-to-day managerial responsibility and decision-making.
Such an approach would be based on the understanding that
actual provision would be provided by in-house and external providers on an equal and
competitive basis.
[ Top ]
4.2 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
4.2.1 Whilst affording the opportunity for central
strategic direction and coordination, the first option would undoubtedly encounter the
problems associated with the prescriptive rigidities of the past (see Chapter 2).
Moreover, it would be in sharp contrast to the declared intention of the Government,
expressed for example in the RDP White Paper and the WPTPS, to encourage flexibility and
creativity in meeting local needs through the devolution and decentralisation of
managerial responsibility. The first model is also potentially very costly and is often
unable either to meet specific needs or to do this in a flexible manner.
4.2.2 The second and third options would offer the benefits
of decentralisation and maximum flexibility, but at the serious risk of the emergence of
an uncoordinated and inefficient provision of public service training and education
characterised by an uneven adherence to national norms and standards, and a potentially
wasteful duplication of programmes and activities.
4.2.3 For these reasons, the Government will base its
institutional arrangements for the new public service training and education policy on the
fourth option above. This should ensure a balanced mix between-
- a uniformly applied set of national norms and standards;
- flexibility at the departmental and provincial levels to
design and deliver programmes tailored to meet specific needs;
- a competitive environment for providers (both in-house and
external) who will be required to deliver high quality products if they want to secure
contracts for the delivery of training and education programmes.
[ Top ]
PART 2: IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK
CHAPTER 5
TRAINING PRINCIPLES, PRIORITIES & GUIDELINES FOR
PSTE
5.1 GOAL STATEMENT
The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a clear and
effective basis for the development of national norms and standards to inform and
guide public service training policy, particularly in relation to such issues as training
priorities, certification and accreditation, access and entitlement, and the relationship
of training to policies on job grading, remuneration, probation, promotion, performance
appraisal, and recruitment and selection in the public service.
5.2 OBJECTIVES
The key objectives of the Chapter are:
- To set out the broad principles and priorities that the
Government believes should guide the new approach to PSTE.
- To identify a number of more specific and detailed
operational guidelines for its successful implementation.
- To review some of the key implications of this new approach,
with respect to such issues as performance appraisal, accreditation, and the relation of
training to policies on recruitment, promotion, grading, and remuneration; and to make
appropriate recommendations for changes in existing regulations and prescripts governing
public service training and education.
[ Top ]
5.3 NORMS AND STANDARDS
5.3.1 The principles, priorities, guidelines and
recommendations set out below will help to provide the basis for the development of new
and revised national norms and standards for public service training and education.
Standards in this context refer to benchmarks of best management practice, rather than to
specific training and education standards and qualifications which will be discussed in
Section 5.7.9 of this document.
5.3.2 The principal responsibility for drawing up such
norms and standards, and embodying them in revised regulations for the public service,
will rest with the Department of Public Service and Administration, following a process of
consultation with all relevant stakeholders at the national and provincial levels and,
where appropriate, following negotiation with employee organisations in the Coordinating
Bargaining Council.
5.3.3 In developing such norms and standards, the
Department will be mindful of the need to avoid the over-centralised and prescriptive
rigidities of the past, and to give effect to the decentralised forms of managerial
responsibility and accountability called for in the White Paper on Public Service
Transformation and the Green Paper on Policy Proposals for a New Public Service Statute.
5.4 SCOPE
5.4.1 The principles, priorities and guidelines outlined
below will apply specifically and directly to transversal training and education in those
parts of the public sector, both national and provincial, which are regulated by the
Public Service Act of 1994 (Proclamation 103/94).
5.4.2 However, it is the Government's intention that these
principles, priorities and guidelines should also guide and inform, where appropriate, the
provision of sector-specific training and education in those parts of the service covered
by the Act, as well as the provision of training and education more generally in those
parts of the public sector which fall outside it.
5.5 LEARNING PRINCIPLES
5.5.1 The formulation, implementation and evaluation of
programmes of public service training and education will be carried out in accordance with
the following broad principles:
[ Top ]
- Access and entitlement - all public servants
will be entitled to ongoing and meaningful opportunities for training and education, on
recruitment and throughout their working lives (This broad principle will also be extended
to cover potential recruits to the public service through the development and improvement
of the current bursary schemes).
- Needs analysis - programmes of training and
education will be based on a detailed assessment of the needs of individual organisations
and employees, and will be designed in particular to secure an optimal fit between these
two sets of needs.
- A competency-based approach to learning outcomes
- the new approach to public service training and education will focus on outcomes rather
than inputs, with particular reference to the competences required at different levels to
build individual and organisational capacity.
- Integration between policy-formulation, strategic
planning and transformation - far from being marginalised, as in the past, it will
be expected of government departments and provincial administrations to systematically
link training and education to the broader processes of policy formulation, strategic
planning and transformation, at national, departmental and provincial levels, particularly
in relation to service delivery, institution-building and management, human resources
development, and representivity and affirmative action.
- Adequate resourcing - will be vital for the
success of the training and education system, and will be ensured in particular by
integrating plans and priorities for training and education as a central element in the
budget planning process, at national, departmental and provincial levels.
- Flexibility and decentralisation - to ensure
that programmes of training and education are designed flexibly to meet the individual and
changing needs of particular departments and provinces, responsibility will be
decentralised as much as possible, within agreed national norms and standards.
- Career pathing - programmes of training and
education will be targeted in particular at facilitating career paths for all staff that
promote progression (vertical and lateral) and productivity, and for this reason such
programmes will need to be positively related to policies on recruitment, promotion,
grading, remuneration and performance appraisal.
- Lifelong learning - public service training
and education will be linked to the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) in ways which
promote lifelong learning and the development of portable skills and competences. PSTE
will also be linked to the Department of Labour's Skills Development Strategy,
particularly through the development of appropriate learnerships for the service.
- Learning organisations - training, education
and development will be promoted in ways which enable public service institutions to
become learning organisations, capable of continuous development and adaptation through
the creative integration of learning with work at all levels.
- Quality and cost-effectiveness - will be
promoted through the effective utilisation of available resources; the avoidance of
duplication; the establishment of effective structures and mechanisms for the coordination
of training and education at national and provincial levels; the introduction of improved
forms of standard setting and accreditation; and the targeting of training and education
at activities that add value by developing skills, knowledge and attitudes that can be
readily transferred to the job.
- Equity and empowerment - training and
education will be linked to broader plans and programmes for promoting employment and
occupational equity, and will be targeted in particular at the empowerment of historically
disadvantaged groups.
- Consultation and participation - to ensure
broad commitment and support at all levels within the public service, plans and programmes
for training and education will be formulated, implemented and evaluated with the full
participation and involvement of the public service unions and all other relevant
stakeholders.
- Information and communication - information
about training and education opportunities will be collected and collated, and effectively
disseminated at all levels throughout the public service.
- Effective design and delivery - to enhance the
relevance, quality and cost-effectiveness of training and education, programmes will be
designed and delivered in accordance with the twelve training principles set out in
Chapter C of the Public Service Staff Code (see Appendix B).
- Monitoring and evaluation - in order to ensure
that plans and programmes of training and education are carried out throughout the public
service in accordance with the above principles, effective mechanisms for ongoing
monitoring and evaluation will be put into place.
- Elevating the status of training and trainers
- to ensure that training, education and human resources development more generally play
an increasingly strategic and integral part in building a new public service in South
Africa, the position, role and status of trainers as human resource specialists will need
to be significantly redefined and enhanced.
5.5.2 The above principles are taken to be applicable to
education as well as training activities.
[ Top ]
5.6 PRIORITIES
5.6.1 In line with the trend towards greater flexibility
and decentralisation in the public service, the setting of priorities for training and
education will be the responsibility in the main of individual departments and provincial
administrations. This is to ensure that programmes of training and education are tailored
effectively to meet local needs and circumstances.
5.6.2 Departmental and provincial training priorities will
need to be set, however, in accordance with the principles outlined above. They will also
need to conform to the broad national training priorities laid down for the short to
medium term in the WPTPS, as follows:
- The induction and orientation of new lateral entrants to the
public service.
- The retraining and reorientation of long-serving officials.
- The development of programmes in key areas such as the new
constitutional and socio-economic framework, customer service, leadership, the management
of change and diversity, policy formulation and analysis, strategic planning, project
management, business planning, information technology, and effective human resources
management (including participative management and teamwork); these will be targeted at
senior and middle managers in particular.
- The targeting of training for the management and delivery of
services in key departments and programmes linked to the RDP, especially in education,
health, police and social services.
- The widespread development of ABET, competency-based
training, customer care, and personal effectiveness and life skills training for
front-line workers.
- The development of multi skilling especially at the lower
levels of the public service, where de skilling has historically been a feature.
- Training and retraining for those displaced by the
restructuring process, to enable them to take advantage of redeployment opportunities.
- The provision of accelerated and intensive skills training
programmes for affirmative action appointees (women and people with disabilities in
particular).
- The provision of training at all levels in gender and race
awareness, public service ethics, and respect for cultural diversity and human rights.
- The training and retraining of trainers.
5.6.3 In line with the recommendations in the National
Disability Strategy, priority will also be accorded to disability awareness training to
enable managers and able-bodied workers to facilitate the full participation of fellow
disabled employees, and to deliver more disability sensitive services to the public.
5.6.4 Given the need to ensure that the training and
education strategy proposed in this document is effectively integrated into NQF and SAQA
frameworks, as well as into the Department of Labour's Skills Development Strategy, an
additional priority will be to arrange workshops and training courses for managers and
staff (HRD managers and staff in particular) in the operation of such things as the NQF,
SAQA, National Standards Bodies, Standards Generating Bodies, Education and Training
Quality Assurers (ETQAs), Sectoral Education and Training Organisations (SETOs), and
Learnerships.
[ Top ]
5.7 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
5.7.1 Introduction
5.7.1.1 In order to realise the above principles and
priorities at the operational level, policies and programmes of public service training
and education will need in particular to be implemented in ways which are -
- based on a comprehensive and effective assessment of
training and education needs at both the individual and organisational level;
- capable of realising positive learning outcomes which add
value to individual and organisational performance;
- based on the achievement of measurable competences, linked
to the NQF framework;
- systematically planned and strategically linked to broader
processes of human resources development and organisational transformation;
- based on effective forms of certification and accreditation
of training and education programmes and providers.
5.7.2 Needs Assessment
5.7.2.1 If programmes of training and education are to
succeed in building the motivation, capacity and performance of the workforce, it is
increasingly recognised, both at home and abroad, that they must be based in the first
place on an objective and systematic assessment of institutional and individual needs.
5.7.2.2 The individual needs may be personal,
performance-related or career-related, and will include, amongst other things -
- updating knowledge, skills and job-related competences;
- increasing job satisfaction and the fulfilment of personal
goals;
- helping staff to make decisions about career choices and
facilitating career progression;
- facilitating identification of personal strengths and
weaknesses;
- assisting staff in identifying and achieving their work
values and work targets;
- developing communication, personal effectiveness and life
skills;
- enabling staff to improve their qualifications;
- facilitating individual learning and self-development;
- building self-awareness, self-confidence and motivation.
5.7.2.3 Whilst departments and provinces will devote a
large proportion of their staff development resources to assisting staff in identifying
and meeting their individual needs, the process will clearly need to be situated within
the broader context of the institutional needs and priorities that have to be met,
particularly in relation to the WPTPS goals of -
- improving service delivery and customer care;
- the creation of a rationalised and integrated public
service;
- institution building to promote greater organisational
efficiency and cost-effectiveness;
- representivity and affirmative action;
- the promotion of greater internal democracy and external
accountability;
- the promotion of a professional service ethos.
5.7.2.4 Departments and provincial administrations will
seek, where possible, to secure an optimal fit or balance between individual and
institutional needs. Given budgetary constraints, this will not always be possible,
however. Potential conflicts may arise -
- between the needs of different individuals;
- between different institutional needs;
- between individual and institutional needs.
5.7.2.5 In resolving such conflicts it will be important
for departments and provincial administrations to prioritise their institutional and
individual needs for training and education in the light of prevailing budgetary
constraints, national priorities for transformation (outlined in the WPTPS), national
priorities for PSTE in particular (outlined in Section 5.6.2 above), and local
circumstances and strategic planning priorities. Decisions taken should be transparent and
based on consultation with training committees, staff, unions and other relevant
stakeholders.
[ Top ]
5.7.3 Personal Development Plans
5.7.3.1 In order to ensure a needs-based approach to the
training and education, personal development plans will be drawn up, where feasible
and appropriate, for all members of staff. These will be designed to identify the needs of
staff and measures to achieve them, within the context of the individual's overall career
progression, as well as within the context of the organisational objectives and priorities
of the department or province concerned.
5.7.3.2 The introduction of a personal development plan
system will help to ensure that the principle of access and entitlement of all
staff to meaningful training and education opportunities becomes a practical reality.
5.7.3.3 Personal development plans will seek to identify in
particular -
- the current competences of staff (which will help to form
the basis for an effective skills audit);
- the work values of staff (e.g. career progression, helping
others, creativity, being skilled and respected in one's work);
- the work and career targets of staff;
- the competences (skills, knowledge and attitudes) that will
need to be developed to enable staff to successfully meet their work and career targets;
- an individually tailored programme of staff development,
training, education and support (including learnerships where appropriate) designed
to enable staff to acquire the relevant competences and meet their work targets and
personal and career objectives.
5.7.3.4 Personal development plans will be drawn up in a
negotiated way between the line manager/supervisor and the individual staff member. They
will be regularly reviewed, and will be formally appraised and updated on an annual basis.
5.7.3.5 To carry out their work effectively supervisors
will require training and ongoing advice and support, in particular from the
organisation's human resources specialists, who will also be responsible, together with
departmental and provincial training committees, for monitoring and evaluating the general
operation and effectiveness of the personal development plan system.
5.7.3.6 It is recognised by Government that the
introduction of a personal development plan system may place additional financial burdens
on departments, and will inevitably place additional burdens on the time and capacity of
supervisors and HRD departments. This is likely to be the case in particular with respect
to the larger departments. For this reason the model system envisaged above may well need
to be phased in over time, and to be tailored in specific detail to the particular needs
and resources of individual departments and provincial administrations.
[ Top ]
5.7.4 Adding Value through Positive Learning Outcomes
5.7.4.1 A major shift in the process through which public
service training and education programmes are designed and delivered is clearly required.
In the past such programmes were essentially supply-driven and input-based. They reflected
the views of the various training providers (internal or external) about what should be
learned and the ways in which it should be learned. Public servants either volunteered or
were required to sign-up for what were essentially predetermined programmes.
5.7.4.2 In the future, training providers will now be
required to move towards a demand-driven and outcomes-based approach to their work. Such
an approach will be designed to promote access to competence and accreditation by
recognising that there are many different routes to obtaining knowledge and skills, and
that the choice of "best route" for an individual will depend on a variety of
circumstances, including the experience and learning that have occurred to date.
5.7.4.3 A key assumption of this approach is that learning
will be more effective when individuals are enabled to use learning styles and contexts
that most closely matches their needs.
5.7.4.4 The move towards an outcomes-based approach to
public service training and education will place the service firmly in line with current
developments within the NQF framework.
5.7.5 A Competency-Based Approach to Training and
Education
5.7.5.1 Learning outcomes will often be expressed in fairly
broad and general terms (for example, greater effectiveness in one's work, or enhanced
opportunities and prospects for career progression). In order to apply such outcomes in
terms of specific programmes of staff development, training and education, it will be
important to express them in terms of measurable competences.
5.7.5.2 A competency-based approach to training and
education will therefore be an integral part of the move towards a broader needs-based and
outcomes-based approach to public service training and education.
5.7.5.3 Competence can be defined as the application of
skills, knowledge and attitudes to tasks or combination of tasks to standards under
operational conditions. As such competence does not refer to the unique characteristics of
an individual worker, but rather serves as a measure against which individuals may be
judged for the purposes of formal or informal evaluation and accreditation.
5.7.5.4 Competences, therefore, are descriptions of
performance which answer such questions as:
- What do people have to be good at doing to be effective in
their job?
- How does an individual know that she or he is carrying out
the job effectively?
5.7.5.5 Standards, as used in Section 5.7.5.3 above, will
normally be expressed as:
- A set of performance criteria which are observable,
measurable and assessable;
- A desired outcome of the competence.
5.7.5.6 Appendix G provides an illustration of the kinds of
competences, performance criteria and outcomes that might be expected from administrative
assistants and administrative officers in the areas of management of work, working with
people, and personal effectiveness. This is provided as an example, and is based on the
actual competences, criteria and outcomes used for such grades by the British Ministry of
Defence.
[ Top ]
5.7.5.7 All public service institutions will be required to
conduct job evaluations or revaluations of all posts, with the purpose of ensuring that
they are expressed in terms of the essential competences required for effective job
performance in the context of the new vision and mission laid down for the public service
in the WPTPS. This will involve both functional or sector-specific competences and core
transversal competences.
5.7.5.8 In the case of core transversal competences, the
definition of competence will encompass a broad range of skills, knowledge and attitudes,
including -
- the ability to carry out effectively the routine tasks of
the job;
- the ability to transfer skills, knowledge and attitudes to
new situations within the same occupational area;
- the ability to reflect on ones work, learn from
ones actions, and innovate and cope with non-routine activities;
- the personal effectiveness to deal effectively with
co-workers, managers and customers.
5.7.5.9 The introduction of a competency-based approach
will assist the development of an outcomes-led model of training and education in a number
of important ways. These will include forming an effective and measurable basis -
- for the objective evaluation of current performance, and the
effective assessment of current and future needs;
- for the design and delivery of training programmes and
courses, as well as other staff development interventions, targeted at the achievement of
specific and meaningful competences;
- for the standardisation and accreditation of such programmes
and courses through the NQF framework;
- for the subsequent evaluation of the effectiveness of such
programmes and courses.
5.7.5.10 The introduction of a competency-based approach
will also form the basis for improvements in the current systems of performance appraisal,
recruitment and selection, and promotion. Evidence from the stakeholders consulted in the
drawing up of this document, demonstrated concern, for example, that the current systems
of recruitment and promotion placed too much emphasis on the possession of formal
qualifications and experience (which may not always be a reliable indicator of actual
competency), and too little on prior learning and experience obtained through less formal
means. There is no doubt that this acts to the detriment of historically disadvantaged
groups, whether applying for jobs or for promotion.
5.7.5.11 This does not imply, of course, that formal
qualifications and experience will no longer be used as a criteria for recruitment or
promotion. For many positions within the public service, the possession of appropriate
qualifications and/or experience will continue to be essential. However, departments will
be encouraged in such cases to introduce or sponsor specific education and training
courses for those from disadvantaged groups who show the necessary potential to attain
such qualifications.
[ Top ]
5.7.6 Strategic Planning at Departmental and Provincial
Levels
5.7.6.1 Historically human resources issues in the South
African public service have been regarded as administrative or technical matters rather
than the strategic management concerns that can, if properly managed, make a major
contribution to the achievement of socio-economic goals.
5.7.6.2 This situation will clearly have to change if
training and education are to make the kind of dynamic contribution to enhancing the
individual and organisational capacity of public service institutions envisaged in this
White Paper.
5.7.6.3 At the level of individual departments and
provincial administrations, a number of related elements will be involved in this process.
5.7.6.4 In the first place training and education
will need to be systematically linked to broader processes of human resources development.
5.7.6.5 In the second place the status of
training and trainers, as well as human resources specialists more generally, will need to
be significantly enhanced. Positive signs in this regard are already evident in a number
of departments and provinces, particularly through the creation of new human resources
divisions with a broader role and greater powers than in the past.
5.7.6.6 In the third place plans and programmes for
human resources development and training must be strategically linked to broader plans for
service delivery, institution building, transformation, and in particular to the budget
planning process. This will be an essential step in ensuring that the training plans and
programmes identified as the result of the training needs assessment are effectively
prioritised, equipped with the appropriate levels of budgetary support, and provided with
the necessary commitment and support from top management to ensure their success.
5.7.6.7 In the fourth place training and education
programmes will themselves need to be systematically and strategically planned, monitored
and evaluated. The planning and review process should be fully consultative, involving
management, staff and unions, and plans for training and education will need to be
effectively communicated at all levels within the institution. Steps involved in the
planning and review process will include:
- Needs assessment (individual and organisational).
- Consideration of possible solutions (including training and
other non-training interventions).
- Identifying training and education programmes and
activities, together with their costs.
- Establish priorities in the light of prevailing budgetary
constraints.
- Identify appropriate resources (human, physical and
financial) to implement the prioritised training programmes.
- Formulate, communicate and implement an annual strategic
plan for training and education.
- Monitor, evaluate and feedback into ongoing process of
planning and review.
[ Top ]
5.7.7 Capacity Development Standard
5.7.7.1 To encourage departments and provincial
administrations to move increasingly towards this kind of strategic approach to training
and education, it is proposed that a Capacity Development Standard (CDS) will be
introduced, and that annual awards will be made to those institutions who meet its
requirements.
5.7.7.2 The CDS will be defined in a document that will be
distributed to all heads of departments and provincial administrations. This will contain
a detailed set of criteria dealing with generic issues such as the following:
- Has the department conducted a training and education needs
analysis (of individual and organisational needs)?
- Has a training and education strategy been developed to meet
these needs?
- Has this strategy been aligned with broader strategies for
service delivery and organisational and human resources development?
- Has a budget allocation been provided for to finance this
strategy?
- Is there sufficient capacity to make sure that the strategy
can be effectively implemented?
- Where strategies have been implemented, are monitoring and
evaluation systems in place to ensure that they are being carried out effectively?
5.7.7.3 Responsibility for drawing up the detailed criteria
for the CDS will lie with the DPSA, in consultation with other key stakeholders. Once all
relevant bodies have approved the CDS, an annual review of all departments will be
undertaken to identify those who qualify for the award. An appropriate decision-making
process will be developed in cooperation with the PSC by the DPSA to apply this approach.
5.7.7.4 The end result will be a Ministerial event whereby
the Minister for the Public Service and Administration will make the annual awards of CDS
status. This will give political acknowledgement and backing to the achievement of a
specific notion of excellence in the field of public service training and education.
5.7.7.5 The competitive approach to this sort of
institutional development is seen as a positive way of building awareness of the need for
effective training and education strategies, and their value and importance.
5.7.7.6 In the White Paper on the Transformation of the
Public Service (Chapter 9 [a]), it is proposed that the contracts of Heads of Department
be tied to the achievement of specific performance-related objectives and targets. If
performance-related contracts are introduced, the achievement of satisfactory progress
towards the attainment of CDS status could well be included as one such target.
[ Top ]
5.7.8 Prescribed Competences rather than Courses
5.7.8.1 More specifically, a key strategic intervention at
the national level concerns the issue of prescribed courses. In the present system,
prescribed training and education courses are those deemed essential throughout the public
service for appointed to or employment in a particular post grade. Such courses must
conform to the curricula and/or other prescripts pertaining to the relevant courses set in
the Training Course Standards (TCS) which form part of the Public Service Staff Code.
5.7.8.2 With respect to transversal training,
responsibility for prescribing such courses was formerly the business of the PSC, but now
rests with the DPSA. The DPSA is also responsible for registering training institutions
that wish to conduct prescribed training courses.
5.7.8.3 Consultation with stakeholders has revealed a
number of problems with the current system of prescribed training courses. These include
the lack of flexibility in tailoring training and education to local needs and
circumstances; the frequent lack of congruity between training courses and the actual
competences required to perform effectively at the particular level concerned; the lack of
recognition for suitable competences acquired through prior learning or experience; and
the lack of cost-effectiveness when the relevant competences could be acquired through
alternative and less expensive forms of staff development experience.
5.7.8.4 It is therefore proposed that the public service
will move from a system of prescribed courses to a system of prescribed core transversal
competences at different grade levels, linked wherever possible to the NQF framework.
5.7.8.5 Initially the DPSA will take responsibility for
drawing up such competences in partnership with national departments, provincial
administrations, and employee organisations. This role will be taken over by the Public
Service Education and Training Organisation (PSETO), once this body has been established.
Recommended competences at the different grade levels will be submitted by the PSETO to
the DPSA for approval and dissemination throughout the service.
5.7.8.6 The fact that the majority representation on the
managing board of the PSETO will take the form of representatives from national
departments, provincial administrations and employee organisati |